Getty says ‘no’ to AI-generated images

Getty Images It's okay with altered photographs or artistic images, as long as they were created by human hands.

Getty Images It’s okay with altered photographs or artistic images, as long as they were created by human hands.
photo, Wirestock Manufacturer ,Shutterstock,

Deepfakes are no longer desired, fakes are now out, and any AI-originated content will be deprecated from the image hosting website Getty Images.

Getty provided a communication originally sent to Gizmodo to the site’s contributors, confirming that, effective immediately, the site will reject any submissions made by AI Image Generator. Getty specifically mentioned that any images created using popular tools like Stable Diffusion, DAL-E, and MidJourney are now banned., In addition, any prior images uploaded to the Site who were Created using AI will be deleted.

According to Getty Communications, the move is due to open questions of copyright surrounding AI-generated images, particularly “with respect to the underlying imagery and metadata used to extract these models”. Any images edited using tools such as Photoshop and Illustrator are still allowed, as long as they were drawn by human hands.

ledge It was first reported based on comments from the platform’s CEO Craig Peters, who told the site that there were “unresolved rights issues” related to AI art, a particular problem with hosting sites, which is not allowed on its hosted content. Strict copyright controls are required to be maintained. The CEO, further defining his role in the image hosting industry, told The Verge, “Our business has never been about the ease of creating imagery or the resulting volume. It’s about adding and cutting. ,

Although there are still questions about how well these systems can actually manipulate, AI image generators are becoming more and more sophisticated. Earlier this week, OpenAI announced that its DALL-E AI Image Generator would enable modify human faces, As much as the company has said that it is using methods to detect any kind of violent or sexual content, there will always be images that slip up. getty has to handling cases More than questionable copyright in the past, so it is trying to avoid any potential setback in today’s uncertain environment.

People have passed off AI generated content as human-made, including one recent case where a game company CEO used AI content to Win a local art contest, Getty spokesman Alex Lazzaro told Gizmodo that while AI-generated content has been “extremely limited” within their large library, they already had “significant controls” in place to monitor such content.

There is also the question of how the platform will track AI-generated content. A Getty spokesperson said they maintain technology to identify people and figures contained in images submitted to the site. They said they’re working with the Coalition for Content Providence and Authority—or C2PA—to develop image verification processes for the site, though Peters told The Verge that the company had to create automatic filters for bad images. Identifying users will have to be trusted.

But in the meantime, other AI image generators like Stability AI steady spread Much has been used to create substandard content, as the open source program does not include any real filters.

It also doesn’t take much to see how stable the spread depends on copyrighted material. Lexica, which hosts thousands of photos created by user prompts, is filled with images that include A distorted Getty Images watermark, According to Tech Blogger, this AI system is based exclusively on datasets collected by LAION, which includes billions of images scraped from the Internet. Andy Beo, The system reportedly combed through dozens of image hosting sites such as Pinterest, Flickr, DeviantArt, and other user-generated blogs hosted by Blogspot and Tumblr. In addition, of the 12 million images Baio reviewed in LAION’s database, nearly 35,000 were taken from the likes of Getty Images, Vectorstock, and Shutterstock.

Lazzaro did not explain how the company planned to handle the fact that their images were being curated by AI, instead “communicating with other companies and communities to understand perspectives in relation to the broader landscape.” Were there, how legal or regulatory bodies can address that and can we be helpful in resolving.”

Getty isn’t the only platform to ban AI-generated images. Last year, venerable creator content host Newgrounds became one of the first platforms AI. Ban images created by, The popular furry art community Fur Affinity told its users on September 5 that they would update their policy to prohibit AI art, saying it was “lack of artistic merit”, especially when the popular program has been used by others to create content. Sample the work of artists. This month, fledgling art hosting platform Inkblot made it clear that they also have no tolerance AI for the Arts.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*